TexAu vs the tools you're probably also looking at.
We don't run hit pieces. Each comparison is honest about where the other tool wins and where TexAu wins. If you're picking infrastructure for the next two years, you deserve a real comparison.
The comparisons most teams ask about
TexAu vs Clay
Where they win: Building custom data workflows for ops teams that want to wire signals together. The most powerful canvas in the GTM space.
Where we win: Real execution depth (search people, enrich profiles, enrich companies, push to outbound — Clay enriches but doesn't run the actions), pay-on-match credits, and a table interface that doesn't require workflow-building skill. Nobody has to become the Clay person before the first list ships.
Read the full comparison →TexAu vs Apollo
Where they win: Their contact database, built-in dialer, and sequencer. If you want a sales OS that bundles the data with sending, Apollo is one place.
Where we win: Enrichment depth across 32 integrations (Apollo is single-source), bidirectional CRM sync, and being focused — we don't try to be your dialer or your CRM. Credits only burn on a match; Apollo meters you against a capacity tier whether it finds the person or not.
Read the full comparison →TexAu vs ZoomInfo
Where they win: Massive contact database, Bombora intent data, enterprise compliance, and decades-deep Salesforce relationships.
Where we win: Price (~40% the entry point of ZoomInfo), monthly billing, no procurement gauntlet, and a focus on enrichment-as-infrastructure. You are enriching lists the same afternoon, with $0 implementation cost.
Read the full comparison →TexAu vs Phantombuster
Where they win: A long catalog of one-shot scripts for individual social actions. If you want to run a single "phantom," it's quick.
Where we win: Pipelines that combine search, enrichment, verification, scoring, and CRM sync — not just standalone scripts. Pay-on-match credits. Scoring happens in the same table as the data, not in a spreadsheet afterwards.
Read the full comparison →TexAu vs BitScale
Where they win: Sharp entry-tier pricing on waterfall enrichment, modern UX, fast feature velocity for a newer entrant.
Where we win: Action catalog depth (200+ ready-to-run actions vs dozens), bidirectional CRM sync with audit logs, and every outbound rail inside the workflow instead of a subset. Same category, several years further in.
Read the full comparison →TexAu vs Lusha
Where they win: The Chrome extension is the cleanest way to grab a single contact off LinkedIn. Simple pricing for individual users. Solid GDPR/CCPA compliance posture.
Where we win: Pipelines instead of point lookups. 32-integration waterfall instead of single-source. And it runs on a schedule without you in the room — Lusha has no scheduler at all.
Read the full comparison →
Why teams move from Clay, Apollo, and the Hunter-stack to TexAu.
Real automation, not just enrichment
Clay enriches. Apollo dials. TexAu does both and runs the work — search people, enrich profiles, enrich companies, push to outbound, log to CRM, and 200+ actions more ready-to-run. All credit-priced, all one right-click away.
Try it side-by-side.
Run TexAu against your current tool on the same list. 14-day trial, no card, five minutes.
The fastest comparison